User researcher at the UK Home Office
Up to yesterday,
Yocto Project
design lead
“A process that employs people as testing participants who are representative of the target audience to evaluate the degree to which a product meets specific usability criteria.”
Handbook of usability testing 2nd Ed., J. Rubin and D. Chisnell“A process that employs people as testing participants who are representative of the target audience to evaluate the degree to which a product meets specific usability criteria.”
Handbook of usability testing 2nd Ed., J. Rubin and D. Chisnell
Please, stand up
Take out your mobile phone
Sit down if you don't have a French mobile with a data plan
Sit down if you don't speak English
Sit down if you don't like beer
Sit down if you are absolutely terrified by the idea of being our test subject
“A process that employs people as testing participants who are representative of the target audience to evaluate the degree to which a product meets specific usability criteria.”
Handbook of usability testing 2nd Ed., J. Rubin and D. ChisnellFeature phones | 38% |
Smartphones | 55% |
Touch phones | 75% |
Feature phones | 38% |
Smartphones | 55% |
Touch phones | 75% |
Feature phones | 38% |
Smartphones | 55% |
Touch phones | 75% |
Feature phones | 38% |
Smartphones | 55% |
Touch phones | 75% |
Feature phones | 38% |
Smartphones | 55% |
Touch phones | 75% |
Feature phones | 38% |
Smartphones | 55% |
Touch phones | 75% |
Feature phones | 38% |
Smartphones | 55% |
Touch phones | 75% |
Handset usability affects test results
“The results show that the added value of conducting usability evaluations in the field is very little and that recreating central aspects of the use context in a laboratory setting enables the identification of the same usability problem list.”
Is it Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the FieldJ. Kjeldskov, M. B. Skov, B. S. Als, R. T. Høegh, 2004“According to our study there was no difference in the number of problems that occurred in the two test settings. Our hypothesis that more problems would be found in the field was not supported.”
Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Comparison between Laboratory and Field TestingA. Kaikkonen, T. Kallio, A. Kekäläinen, A. Kankainen, M. Cankar - Journal of Usability Studies, 2005“Evaluations conducted in field settings can reveal problems not otherwise identified in laboratory evaluations.”
It’s Worth the Hassle! The Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Mobile Systems in the FieldC.M. Nielsen, M. Overgaard, M.B. Pedersen, J. Stage, S. Stenild - NordiCHI 2006“The analysis of the comparison between usability testing done in two different settings revealed that there were many more types and occurrences of usability problems found in the field than in the laboratory. Those problems discovered tend to be critical issues.”
Usability Evaluation of Mobile Device: a Comparison of Laboratory and Field TestsH.B Duh, G. C. B. Tan, V. H. Chen, MobileHCI 2006“testing in the field requires double the time in comparison to the laboratory.”
Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Comparison between Laboratory and Field TestingA. Kaikkonen, T. Kallio, A. Kekäläinen, A. Kankainen, M. Cankar - Journal of Usability Studies, 2005“evaluations in the field (are) more complex and time-consuming”
It’s Worth the Hassle! The Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Mobile Systems in the FieldC.M. Nielsen, M. Overgaard, M.B. Pedersen, J. Stage, S. Stenild - NordiCHI 2006“field-based usability studies are not easy to conduct. They are time-consuming”
Is it Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the FieldJ. Kjeldskov, M. B. Skov, B. S. Als, R. T. Høegh, 2004Testing in the lab is better than no testing
“there is still no definite answer to the lab versus field question (...) the real question is not if - but when and how - to go into the field.”
Was it Worth the Hassle? Ten Years of Mobile HCI Research Discussions on Lab and Field EvaluationsJ. Kjeldskov and M.B. Skov, MobileHCI 2014Do not assume flawless connectivity
4 approaches to the small detail of how on earth are you going to record the whole thing
A Field Laboratory for Evaluating in Situ
R. T. Høegh, J. Kjeldskov, M. B. Skov, J. Stage, 2011
Allows testing in the field
High quality screen footage
“Screen recording software rarely provides finger footage (...) recording with an external camera is still the preferred method”
Usability Testing for Mobile is EasyR. Budiu, Nielsen Norman Group (2014)Usability Testing for Mobile is EasyR. Budiu, Nielsen Norman Group (2014)
Good recording quality with easy setup process
It allows natural interaction with the mobile device
2 Meccano trunions
Two 5, 6 and 7-hole Meccano strips
One 11-hole Meccano strip
Six Meccano screws & nuts
One 13-20mm jubilee clip
One HUE HD webcam
A second USB webcam
A USB male to female extension cable
Some Blu Tack
An allen key
A Meccano wrench
A screwdriver
A computer (t'is Linux today)
Webcam app (GUVCView)
Screen recording software (recordMyDesktop)
After her talk, Belén must rush to the airport to catch a flight. Using the Paris Airports website (www.parisaeroport.fr), can you tell her how much money will a taxi cost? She is going from the conference venue in 2 place Émile Cresp to Charles de Gaulle terminal 2C.
“We expect much of our buildings: they need to have firm foundations, solid structures, pleasing aesthetics. We should expect the same of emerging mobile systems”
Mobile Interaction DesignM. Jones and G. Marsden (2005)